Pledge of Allegiance essaysThe pledge of allegiance is by definition a solemn swear of allegiance to the United States. But recently, it has been under attack by some.
Arabic version of Pledge of Allegiance at Pine Bush High School ignites furor
What began as an effort to celebrate national Foreign Language Week at Pine Bush High School has imploded into a raging controversy that has divided the school into angry factions.
The Pledge of Allegiance Essay - 1845 Words | Bartleby
Children are back in school and, as part of their daily routine, most of them will be expected to participate in the reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance. Recitation of the Pledge is a requirement under the laws of over forty states.
For a time, I was a government official on City staff in the town where I live. Part of my job involved attending City Council meetings at which the pledge was always said. One of the Council members noticed that I did not say the pledge. She took it upon herself to call me at home and ask (nicely) why I didn’t say the pledge. She then told me all about how here brother had died fighting for this country and how saying the pledge was an important reminder for her of his sacrifice. I respectfully explained to her that during my six years as an officer in the Navy I never once was asked to say the pledge of allegiance, but I did take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. Neither she nor anyone else ever bothered me about it again. Battles over the Pledge have resulted in multiple acrimonious lawsuits and disputes, with no change to the law, only increasing resentment and hostility on both sides of the dispute. It's time to reframe the debate. We should not look at the Pledge issue as a controversy over whether to eliminate God from the Pledge, but rather as a challenge to consider how the Pledge practice can be modified to accommodate the religious diversity of this country, allowing both believer and nonbeliever to participate in pledging allegiance to their country. We are part of "one nation" whether or not we believe in God. -- The U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments on whether to preserve the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance recited daily by American schoolchildren. Congress added the words to the pledge in 1954, at the height of anti-communist fervor. Now, a California father and avowed atheist is suing, saying the pledge amounts to an endorsement of religion. Listen to a radio segment about this controversial case.Finally, there would be the concern that those students who say the Pledge without "under God" will become the targets of bullying and harassment. That could happen, but the situation of nonreligious students will be no worse than it is now. Today, the conscientious nonreligious students who decline to say the Pledge are made conspicuous by having to remain completely silent, effectively putting a target on their backs. Plus, because they are barred from participating unless they affirm belief in God, they are stigmatized as unpatriotic individuals who hold views incompatible with pledging allegiance to their country. Official recognition that saying the Pledge without "under God" is perfectly appropriate should remove some of that stigma. -- an article about the Supreme Court dismissing the Pledge of Allegiance case in June of 2004 -- they dismissed the case, not based on a decision about the "under god" issue but, rather, on the grounds that the father who brought the case (an atheist acting on behalf of his third grade daughter), did not have the legal standing to do this, because he wasinvolved in a custody dispute with the mother.