21 Equal Opportunity Review, 'News, 'Limited Progress for Top Women say Hansard Society', EOR No.67 May/June 1998, page 7. 22 Labour Research (January 1999); Price Waterhouse Corporate Register, 'Women at the Top update' (Hansard Society). 23 Article 2 (1) of the Equal Treatment Directive 76/207 reads ' For the purposes
Hopkins came to Price Waterhouse on a strong recommendation from Touch Ross. Price Waterhouse consisted of three departments. Accounting and auditing, tax services and management advisory services. Hopkins came on as a manager in the Management Advisory Services (MAS) department. The firm was a professional partnership whose clients included many Fortune 500 companies. During the timeframe of this case Price Waterhouse had 662 partners across 90 U.S.
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 234-35 (1989).
Mary Anne Case, Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 66 McGinley, note 26, at 770-72; Reed, note 25; Jennifer S. Hendricks, , 103 discussing how a separate ENDA may harm intersectional plaintiffs); Jill D. Weinberg, , 44 specifically discussing the potential consequences of a proposed ENDA variant lacking gender-identity protections); William C. Sung, Note, , 84 discussing the greater political feasibility of addressing sexual orientation discrimination through existing Title VII provisions as opposed to passing a new statute)should note an important recent aspect of the debate over ENDA, if only to cabin itâCase and Reed, in particular, see the religious exemptions in some versions of ENDA as a dangerous retreat from the protections available under , which are limited only by narrow religious exemptions to Title VII most recently delineated in , 132 S. Ct. 694 (2012). Case, , at 1375-77; Reed, note 25, at 309-14. The debate over the normative and political desirability of these sorts of protections is a vital one, but it is one that falls beyond the scope of this Note.